Role of Discussion Method in Developing Logical Reasoning in Students at University Level


  • Saima Kayani Department of Education, University of Kotli Azad Jammu and Kashmir
  • Aneela Tariq Department of Education, University of Kotli, AJ&K



Discussion Method, Logical Reasoning, Inductive Reasoning, Detective Reasoning


This study was conducted to find out the role of discussion method in developing logical reasoning in students at university level. The current study was quantitative and descriptive in nature and survey method was conducted for the data collection. Simple random sampling technique was used for the selection of sample. A questionnaire based on five-point Likert scale was used as a research tool in this study. The researcher personally visited all the department of faculty of social sciences in university of Kotli Azad Jammu and Kashmir and collected the data. Statistical package for Social Science software (SPSS) was used for the analysis of data. The researcher applied frequency, percentage and mean for the analysis of data. It was found that students find it easy to draw conclusions from patterns and trends that they observe and students faced new information that they often make educated guesses about what might happen next. It is recommended that teachers may involve students in different activities according to the patterns and trends, and teacher encourage them.


Download data is not yet available.



Akmaljonovich, K. J. (2022). Role Of Philosophy Education In Forming Intellectual Culture In

Future Teachers. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(11), 1366-1371.

Alannasir, W. (2020). Characteristic-based development students aspect. International Journal

of Asian Education, 1(1), 29-36.

Bao, Q., et al. (2023). "Contrastive Learning with Logic-driven Data Augmentation for Logical

Reasoning over Text." arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12599.

Beeson, P. M., Rising, K., Sachs, A., & Rapcsak, S. Z. (2022). Common predictors of spoken

and written language performance in aphasia, alexia, and agraphia. Frontiers in Human

Neuroscience, 16, 719.

Bringsjord, S., Giancola, M., & Govindarajulu, N. S. (2023). Logic-based modeling of cognition. The Handbook of Computational Psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming). http://kryten. mm. rpi. edu/Logic basedComputationalModelingOfCognition. pdf.

Brunton, G., & Wilson, T. (2020). Terrorism: Its Past, Present & Future Study-A Special Issue to

Commemorate CSTPV at 25. Contemporary Voices: St Andrews Journal of International Relations, 1(4).

Castañeda, L. E. G., Sklarek, B., Dal Mas, D. E., & Knauff, M. (2023). Probabilistic and deductive reasoning in the human brain. NeuroImage, 275, 120180.

Cheah, H. M. and L. L. Lee (2022). Higher Education in Singapore: Perspectives and Future

Orientation. Education in Singapore: People-Making and Nation-Building, Springer: 87-116.

Garcia-Garcia, E. and X. Eekhout (2023). Responsible Research and Innovation Learning Facilitation. Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice: The ETHNA System Project, Springer: 137-154.

Gökalp, E. and V. Martinez (2022). "Digital transformation maturity assessment: development of the digital transformation capability maturity model." International Journal of Production Research 60(20): 6282-6302.

Guljakhon, U. and P. Shakhodat (2020). "Developing teachersprofessional competence and critical thinking is a key factor of increasing the quality of education." Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal: 66-75.

Jandrić, P., Martinez, A. F., Reitz, C., Jackson, L., Grauslund, D., Hayes, D., ... & Hayes, S.

(2022). Teaching in the age of Covid-19—The new normal. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(3), 877-1015.

Jankelova, N., & Puhovichova, D. (2022). Managerial decision-making in the era of Industry

0. Industry 4.0, 7(2), 71-75.

Kistruck, G. M., & Slade Shantz, A. (2022). Research on grand challenges: Adopting an

abductive experimentation methodology. Organization Studies, 43(9), 1479-1505.

Mihalache, G. (2019). Heuristic inquiry: Differentiated from descriptive phenomenology and

aligned with transpersonal research methods. The Humanistic Psychologist, 47(2), 136.

Mogea, T. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Speaking Ability Through Small Group Discussion

Technique to the Firts Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Ratahan.

Muñoz, J. L. R., Ojeda, F. M., Jurado, D. L. A., Peña, P. F. P., Carranza, C. P. M., Berríos, H.

Q., ... & Vasquez-Pauca, M. J. (2022). Systematic review of adaptive learning technology for learning in higher education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 98(98),

Nguyen, H. T., Goebel, R., Toni, F., Stathis, K., & Satoh, K. (2023). How well do SOTA legal

reasoning models support abductive reasoning?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06912.

Nilson, L. B. (2016). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors, John

Wiley & Sons.

O'Grady, N., & Shaw, D. (2023). Resilience, responsibility and state abandon: The changing role

of the government in emergencies. Political Geography, 100, 102796.

Peregrin, J. and V. Svoboda (2023). "Establishing Logical Forms: What is assigned to what, how and why." Logic and Logical Philosophy: 1-22.

Pruś, J. and P. Sikora (2023). "The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical

Discussion." Argumentation: 1-24.

Qomariyah, S. and R. Darmayanti (2023). "Development of High School Students' Mathematical

Reasoning Ability Instruments on Three Dimension Material." JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains 11(1): 249-260.

Rinekso, A. B., & Muslim, A. B. (2020). Synchronous online discussion: teaching English in

higher education amidst the covid-19 pandemic. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 155-162.

Schiele, H., Krummaker, S., Hoffmann, P., & Kowalski, R. (2022). The “research world café” as

method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed. Journal of business research, 140, 280-296.

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education:

Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in science education, 36, 111-139.

Sikhosana, L. (2022). Clarifying the significance of instructional methodologies for

environmental education integration. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(7), 240-248.

Sim, J., & Waterfield, J. (2019). Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges. Quality &

quantity, 53(6), 3003-3022.

Ssemugenyi, F. (2023). Teaching and learning methods compared: A pedagogical evaluation of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture methods in developing learners’ cognitive abilities. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2187943.

Tursunovich, R. I. (2022). Modern Methods in the Methodology of Teaching a Foreign

Language. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 3(12), 146-152.

Vo, D. V., & Csapó, B. (2022). Measuring inductive reasoning in school contexts: a review of

instruments and predictors. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 31(4), 506-525.

Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E., Luo, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Teacher beliefs, classroom process

Wu, C. L., Chen, P. Z., & Chen, H. C. (2022). Measuring conceptual associations via the

development of the Chinese visual remote associates test. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 799928.

Zelazo, P. D., et al. (1997). "Early development of executive function: A problem-solving

framework." Review of general psychology 1(2): 198-226.

Zhang, Y. (2022). The research on critical thinking teaching strategies in college English

classroom. Creative Education, 13(4), 1469-1485.

Zou, D., et al. (2023). "Effects of technology enhanced peer, teacher and self-feedback on

students’ collaborative writing, critical thinking tendency and engagement in learning." Journal of Computing in Higher Education 35(1): 166-185




How to Cite

Kayani, S., & Tariq, A. (2023). Role of Discussion Method in Developing Logical Reasoning in Students at University Level. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Education, 1(3), 16–29.